A multi-centre analysis of a decade of endoscopic pharyngeal pouch surgery in Cheshire and Merseyside.

BACKGROUND: There are sparse data on the outcomes of endoscopic stapling of pharyngeal pouches. The Mersey ENT Trainee Collaborative compared regional practice against published benchmarks. METHODS: A 10-year retrospective analysis of endoscopic pharyngeal pouch surgery was conducted and practice was assessed against eight standards. Comparisons were made between results from the tertiary centre and other sites. RESULTS: A total of 225 procedures were performed (range of 1.2-9.2 cases per centre per year). All centres achieved 90 per cent resumption of oral intake within 2 days. All centres achieved less than 2-day hospital stays. Primary success (84 per cent (i.e. abandonment of endoscopic stapling in 16 per cent)), symptom resolution (83 per cent) and recurrence rates (13 per cent) failed to meet the standard across the non-tertiary centres. CONCLUSION: Endoscopic pharyngeal pouch stapling is a procedure with a low mortality and brief in-patient stay. There was significant variance in outcomes across the region. This raises the question of whether this service should become centralised and the preserve of either tertiary centres or sub-specialist practitioners.

Necrotising otitis externa in the immunocompetent patient: case series.

BACKGROUND: Necrotising otitis externa can be a devastating form of otitis externa. It typically tends to affect patients who are immunocompromised or diabetic. To date, there is very little in the literature about necrotising otitis externa in the immunocompetent patient population. CASE REPORTS: The present paper discusses both the clinical and radiological findings in three cases of necrotising otitis externa in an immunocompetent patient cohort. The common factor among all three patients was their advanced age. CONCLUSION: Diagnosing necrotising otitis externa can be challenging because of the potentially non-specific symptoms and the absence of early radiological signs, particularly if patients are neither immunocompromised nor diabetic. Elderly patients should be considered in the same light as immunocompromised and diabetic patients in the context of necrotising otitis externa.

Can residents be effective trauma team leaders in a major trauma centre?

OBJECTIVE: The overall objective of this study was to compare senior Emergency Department (ED) trainees (residents) with consultant trauma team leaders, assessing their influence on trauma team performance and patient outcomes. We aimed to identify the effect of seniority of leader on time-based performance measures and clinical outcomes. METHODS: This retrospective study of prospectively collected data was conducted in an urban Major Trauma Centre which has a well-established trauma team. For the period covered by this study the trauma team was led by either an ED consultant or specialist registrar having completed a local trauma team leader development programme. Data from all adult trauma team activations for seriously injured trauma patients (ISS - Injury Severity Score >15) presenting between 1st January 2008 and 31st October 2009 were included. Performance measures included time to FAST, time to CT scan and time to haemorrhage control. Patient outcomes were mortality, critical care and hospital length of stay. RESULTS: There were 579 patients seriously injured in the study period. Trainees led 126 (22%) of the trauma teams. Significant differences in times to diagnostics or haemorrhage control between trainees and consultants were only seen in patients presenting with shock. Compared with trainees, consultant team leaders were significantly more likely to achieve targets for diagnostic imaging (FAST <15 min: consultants 97% vs. 33% trainees, p<0.01; CT scan <60 min: 76% vs. 50%, p<0.01) and haemorrhage control (surgery or angiography <60 min: 82% vs. 54%, p<0.001). There was no significant difference in overall mortality between consultants and trainees (consultants 25% vs. trainees 27%, p 1.00). Critical care length of stay was also the same for both (consultants median 5 days vs. trainees median 5 days). CONCLUSIONS: Consultant team leaders improve team performance, resulting in shorter times to diagnostic imaging, and faster transfer to haemorrhage control. The greatest benefit seems to be for bleeding patients. Clinical outcomes were similar for trainees and consultants in our major trauma centre.